RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEWWORK IN PROGRESS

Evidence before
conclusions.

OUR PUBLICATION PRINCIPLE

We publish what we have verified, the evidence behind it, and the limits of those results.

Review the reported results
READER NOTE

The results below are historical owner- or repository-reported snapshots, not independently rerun for this page. Numerical-verification and AI evidence is pending; A World documents are linked below and require repository access.

01

What we do

Three projects, one discipline: keep the claim close to its evidence.

PROJECT 01 / NUMERICAL VERIFICATION

Follow the computation that actually ran.

We investigate how to trace executed numerical operations, reconstruct their order, and account for rounding and error bounds in a specified computation.

01Execution trace
02Operation order
03Error bounds

Research focus: numerical execution, not proof that a physical model describes reality.

PROJECT 02 / KOREAN CONVERSATIONAL AI

Build toward personal conversation.

A Korean conversational AI project under development. The supplied snapshot describes a small GRU prototype for preliminary relational classification in controlled experiments.

30,450parameters in the reported GRU prototype

Owner-reported snapshot; evidence pending. This is not a freely conversing model or a ready-to-use chat service.

PROJECT 03 / A WORLD

A world grounded in physics. A researcher inside it.

The goal is to build A from laws grounded in real physics, then let researcher B observe and experiment within A without real-world data or privileged answers. People outside the world would test whether findings from A hold in reality.

Life, intelligence, and civilization are not prescribed outcomes. A finding inside A is not a real-world discovery until it is tested in reality.

CURRENT SCOPE

A / active
Physical and numerical foundations are the current priority.
L + B / later stages
Life-observation work (L) and the full internal researcher (B) remain later-stage goals, not cancelled projects.
Design boundary
The general atomic/electronic world contract is approved design, not implemented or certified. This status applies to that contract, not to all existing A code.
Read the A World records
02

Experimental results

Read every result with its conditions and its limits.

REPORTED RECORDS

These are historical project reports, not a new independent audit. R.01–03 await evidence links; the A World record cites the private repository snapshot below.

R.02EVIDENCE PENDING

The same formula can take a different path.

What was compared
Source-level and binary-level operation order for the same formula.
Conditions
Specific source/binary comparison in the supplied project record; reproducible configuration pending.
Reported result
A rounding difference associated with a difference in operation order.
Does not prove
That every compiler, binary, or execution environment has the same behavior.
R.03EVIDENCE PENDING

A bound also defines when to stop.

What was tested
Longer-horizon regular-motion and chaotic-case runs.
Conditions
Fixed test configurations and a specified criterion; the full criterion and artifacts are not yet available here.
Reported result
Regular motion met the criterion at 100,000 steps. The chaotic case hit the bound and returned refusal.
Does not prove
Unlimited valid prediction, general stability, or successful verification of the refused chaotic case.
R.04 / AREPOSITORY-REPORTED
03

The evidence record

A result should be inspectable and reproducible within its stated scope.

Evidence has a status, too.

The checklist tracks the unpublished evidence for the numerical-verification and Korean AI reports. A World has commit-pinned repository documents below. Those records require access and have not been independently rerun for this site.

Not published here; availability is unverified
  • 01

    Code & identity

    Versioned source, commit identifiers, binary hashes

    Pending
  • 02

    Inputs & configuration

    Exact inputs, parameters, and acceptance criteria

    Pending
  • 03

    Execution environment

    OS, architecture, compiler, libraries, and runtime

    Pending
  • 04

    Trace & reconstruction

    Raw instruction records, reconstructed operations, logs

    Pending
  • 05

    Checker & rejection tests

    Checker source, output, and tamper-rejection cases

    Pending
  • 06

    Failures & boundaries

    Counterexamples, refusals, and known failure conditions

    Pending
04

Current limitations

These boundaries are part of the result, not a footnote.

01

Numerical verification ≠ physical truth

Checking an executed computation is separate from establishing that its physical model, assumptions, or inputs describe the real world.

02

Results stay within their conditions

The reported tests concern particular inputs, software versions, and execution configurations. They do not establish universal correctness or 100% error detection.

03

Cloud verification remains unfinished

In the supplied snapshot, GCP reconnaissance was implemented, while the formal profile and N1 work were unfinished. This page has not verified a newer status.

04

Conversational AI is still a prototype

Preliminary relational classification in a small GRU is not evidence of open-ended conversational ability. No freely conversing model or public chat service is available through this page.

05

A is a foundation, not a finished world

The current atomic experiments do not establish new life, replication, evolution, or discoveries in reality. L and the full B researcher remain later stages. Deterministic execution alone does not establish realistic physics.

06

Quantum outcome definiteness is unresolved

The general atomic/electronic contract does not establish how to produce one definite quantum outcome while faithfully representing real physics. Its approved design is not implemented or certified, and a virtual-laboratory result does not certify an evolving world.